by our College Data Analytics Team
For student athletes, the right college balances academics with athletics. We have ranked 8 colleges for Men’s Tennis by academic-athletic quality, using our 2026 methodology.
So you can compare your options, College Factual weighs a blend of academic-athletic outcomes (NCAA Academic Progress Rate and Graduation Success Rate), athletic financial resources (team revenue, expenses, and aid per athlete from the EADA survey), and overall school quality, drawing on NCAA, U.S. Department of Education EADA, and IPEDS data. Learn more about our ranking methodology.
Not quite what you need? Use the shortcuts below.
Explore the leading programs below:
Our analysis found Stevens Institute of Technology to be the best college for Men's Tennis in New Jersey. Based in Hoboken, NJ, Stevens Institute of Technology is a private not-for-profit institution. Team revenue averages $19,454 per participant, compared with $19,454 spent per athlete. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $0.
New Jersey Institute of Technology landed the #2 spot for Men's Tennis. Located in Newark, NJ, New Jersey Institute of Technology is a public institution. The team's NCAA APR score is 1000, with a Graduation Success Rate of 100%. About 100% of athletes graduate under the federal rate. Team revenue averages $45,277 per participant, compared with $44,733 spent per athlete. Athletic aid averages $15,477 per athlete.
Monmouth University earned the #3 place for student athletes. Located in West Long Branch, NJ, Monmouth University is a private not-for-profit institution. Athletes here earn an NCAA Academic Progress Rate of 993, and a 100% Graduation Success Rate. The federal graduation rate stands at 100%. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $50,560, with expenses of about $50,560 per participant. The school awards about $20,376 in athletic aid per athlete.
The College of New Jersey came in at #4 on this year's ranking for Men's Tennis. Located in Ewing, NJ, The College of New Jersey is a public institution. The program generates about $5,650 in revenue per athlete, against $5,650 in expenses. The school awards about $0 in athletic aid per athlete.
Princeton University came in at #5 on this year's ranking for Men's Tennis. This private not-for-profit school is set in Princeton, NJ. The team's NCAA APR score is 1000, alongside a GSR of 100%. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $59,465, compared with $59,465 spent per athlete. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $0.
Fairleigh Dickinson University-Metropolitan Campus ranked #6 on our 2026 list for Men's Tennis. Located in Teaneck, NJ, Fairleigh Dickinson University-Metropolitan Campus is a private not-for-profit institution. The team's NCAA APR score is 1000, with a Graduation Success Rate of 100%. Its federal graduation rate is 80%. The program generates about $18,105 in revenue per athlete, against $18,105 in expenses. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $12,185.
Rider University came in at #7 in this year's ranking. Rider University is a private not-for-profit school based in Lawrenceville, NJ. Rider University records an NCAA APR of 1000, and a 100% Graduation Success Rate. About 100% of athletes graduate under the federal rate. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $13,666, with expenses of about $13,666 per participant. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $9,540.
Drew University landed the #8 spot this year. Based in Madison, NJ, Drew University is a private not-for-profit institution. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $5,303, compared with $5,303 spent per athlete. The school awards about $0 in athletic aid per athlete.
*These averages are for the top 25 ranked colleges only.
This list is compiled by College Factual, 2026 edition. Programs are scored on a blend of academic-athletic outcomes (NCAA Academic Progress Rate and Graduation Success Rate), athletic financial resources (team revenue, expenses, and athletic aid from the federal EADA survey), and overall school quality. The current methodology measures academic-athletic quality and does not include team win/loss performance.
References
Read more about our data sources and methodologies.
