by our College Data Analytics Team
For student athletes, the right college balances academics with athletics. We have ranked 5 programs for Men’s Tennis by academic-athletic quality, using our 2026 methodology.
To help you decide, College Factual evaluates each program using a blend of academic-athletic outcomes (NCAA Academic Progress Rate and Graduation Success Rate), athletic financial resources (team revenue, expenses, and aid per athlete from the EADA survey), and overall school quality, drawing on NCAA, U.S. Department of Education EADA, and IPEDS data. Learn more about our ranking methodology.
Not quite what you need? Pick a path below.
Explore the leading programs below:
Leading the list is Bowdoin College, our #1 college for Men's Tennis. Located in Brunswick, ME, Bowdoin College is a private not-for-profit institution. The program generates about $23,090 in revenue per athlete, against $18,928 in expenses. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Bates College landed the #2 spot for Men's Tennis. Bates College is a private not-for-profit school based in Lewiston, ME. Team revenue averages $14,579 per participant, against $13,612 in expenses. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $0.
Colby College is one of the top schools for Men's Tennis, at #3. Located in Waterville, ME, Colby College is a private not-for-profit institution. Team revenue averages $16,140 per participant, compared with $16,140 spent per athlete. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $0.
Thomas College landed the #4 spot for Men's Tennis. Thomas College is a private not-for-profit school based in Waterville, ME. Team revenue averages $1,570 per participant, against $1,565 in expenses. Athletic aid averages $244 per athlete.
University of Southern Maine landed the #5 spot for Men's Tennis. Based in Portland, ME, University of Southern Maine is a public institution. The program generates about $1,363 in revenue per athlete, with expenses of about $1,386 per participant. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
*These averages are for the top 25 ranked colleges only.
This list is compiled by College Factual, 2026 edition. The methodology weighs a blend of academic-athletic outcomes (NCAA Academic Progress Rate and Graduation Success Rate), athletic financial resources (team revenue, expenses, and athletic aid from the federal EADA survey), and overall school quality. The current methodology measures academic-athletic quality and does not include team win/loss performance.
References
More about our data sources and methodologies.