For student athletes, the right college balances academics with athletics. Our ranking highlights 320 programs for Women’s Basketball (Division III) by academic-athletic quality, using our 2026 methodology.
To arm you with the information you need, College Factual weighs a blend of academic-athletic outcomes (NCAA Academic Progress Rate and Graduation Success Rate), athletic financial resources (team revenue, expenses, and aid per athlete from the EADA survey), and overall school quality, drawing on NCAA, U.S. Department of Education EADA, and IPEDS data.
Learn more about our ranking methodology.
Customize This Ranking
Want to narrow by division or explore related lists? Pick a path below.
Johns Hopkins University tops our 2026 ranking of the best colleges for Women's Basketball (Division III). Based in Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University is a private not-for-profit institution. The program generates about $20,271 in revenue per athlete, against $20,271 in expenses. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $2,612.
University of Chicago landed the #2 spot for Women's Basketball (Division III). University of Chicago is a private not-for-profit school based in Chicago, IL. Team revenue averages $23,177 per participant, against $23,177 in expenses. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Washington University in St Louis earned the #3 place for student athletes. This private not-for-profit school is set in St. Louis, MO. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $30,848, compared with $29,226 spent per athlete. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $0.
New York University earned the #4 place for student athletes. Located in New York, NY, New York University is a private not-for-profit institution. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $37,386, compared with $36,897 spent per athlete. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $0.
Bowdoin College came in at #5 on this year's ranking for Women's Basketball (Division III). Located in Brunswick, ME, Bowdoin College is a private not-for-profit institution. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $37,578, compared with $31,282 spent per athlete. The school awards about $0 in athletic aid per athlete.
Emory University came in at #6 in this year's ranking. Emory University is a private not-for-profit school based in Atlanta, GA. Team revenue averages $48,876 per participant, compared with $28,223 spent per athlete. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Amherst College landed the #7 spot this year. Based in Amherst, MA, Amherst College is a private not-for-profit institution. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $28,227, with expenses of about $28,227 per participant. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $0.
Tufts University came in at #8 in this year's ranking. Based in Medford, MA, Tufts University is a private not-for-profit institution. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $19,362, against $17,790 in expenses. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Carnegie Mellon University did well this year, earning the #9 position. Based in Pittsburgh, PA, Carnegie Mellon University is a private not-for-profit institution. The program generates about $19,738 in revenue per athlete, compared with $18,921 spent per athlete. The school awards about $0 in athletic aid per athlete.
Williams College placed #10 among the best colleges for Women's Basketball (Division III). Williams College is a private not-for-profit school based in Williamstown, MA. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $18,781, with expenses of about $18,781 per participant. The school awards about $0 in athletic aid per athlete.
Middlebury College landed the #11 spot this year. Middlebury College is a private not-for-profit school based in Middlebury, VT. The program generates about $20,607 in revenue per athlete, compared with $20,607 spent per athlete. The school awards about $0 in athletic aid per athlete.
Wellesley College did well this year, earning the #12 position. Based in Wellesley, MA, Wellesley College is a private not-for-profit institution. Team revenue averages $21,828 per participant, compared with $21,828 spent per athlete. The school awards about $0 in athletic aid per athlete.
Colby College landed the #13 spot this year. Based in Waterville, ME, Colby College is a private not-for-profit institution. Team revenue averages $22,103 per participant, compared with $22,103 spent per athlete. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Bates College landed the #14 spot this year. This private not-for-profit school is set in Lewiston, ME. The program generates about $24,772 in revenue per athlete, with expenses of about $23,122 per participant. The school awards about $0 in athletic aid per athlete.
Washington and Lee University ranked #15 on our 2026 list for Women's Basketball (Division III). Located in Lexington, VA, Washington and Lee University is a private not-for-profit institution. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $16,928, compared with $16,883 spent per athlete. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Hamilton College came in at #16 in this year's ranking. This private not-for-profit school is set in Clinton, NY. Team revenue averages $21,383 per participant, against $21,383 in expenses. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $0.
Stevens Institute of Technology did well this year, earning the #17 position. This private not-for-profit school is set in Hoboken, NJ. The program generates about $21,441 in revenue per athlete, against $21,441 in expenses. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute ranked #18 on our 2026 list for Women's Basketball (Division III). Located in Worcester, MA, Worcester Polytechnic Institute is a private not-for-profit institution. The program generates about $18,182 in revenue per athlete, against $18,182 in expenses. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
California Institute of Technology did well this year, earning the #19 position. Based in Pasadena, CA, California Institute of Technology is a private not-for-profit institution. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $15,530, compared with $15,530 spent per athlete. The school awards about $0 in athletic aid per athlete.
Brandeis University did well this year, earning the #20 position. Brandeis University is a private not-for-profit school based in Waltham, MA. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $24,073, with expenses of about $24,073 per participant. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Swarthmore College ranked #21 on our 2026 list for Women's Basketball (Division III). This private not-for-profit school is set in Swarthmore, PA. Team revenue averages $16,315 per participant, compared with $14,160 spent per athlete. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Babson College placed #22 among the best colleges for Women's Basketball (Division III). Babson College is a private not-for-profit school based in Wellesley, MA. Per-participant team revenue is roughly $15,653, with expenses of about $15,653 per participant. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Chapman University came in at #23 in this year's ranking. Chapman University is a private not-for-profit school based in Orange, CA. Team revenue averages $18,935 per participant, compared with $18,935 spent per athlete. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Colorado College did well this year, earning the #24 position. This private not-for-profit school is set in Colorado Springs, CO. Team revenue averages $23,216 per participant, with expenses of about $26,885 per participant. Per-athlete athletic aid is roughly $5,478.
University of Rochester came in at #25 in this year's ranking. Based in Rochester, NY, University of Rochester is a private not-for-profit institution. The program generates about $16,762 in revenue per athlete, with expenses of about $18,560 per participant. Athletic aid averages $0 per athlete.
Rest of the Top 50 Colleges for Women’s Basketball (Division III)
Not far behind, these colleges also placed near the top this year:
*These averages are for the top 25 ranked colleges only.
This list is compiled by College Factual, 2026 edition. Rankings consider a blend of academic-athletic outcomes (NCAA Academic Progress Rate and Graduation Success Rate), athletic financial resources (team revenue, expenses, and athletic aid from the federal EADA survey), and overall school quality. The current methodology measures academic-athletic quality and does not include team win/loss performance.